Business week 7 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Business week 7 - Essay Example The role of the delivery can be judged by the fact that failing to deliver the presentation correctly can ruin the overall presentation though the subject matter may be excellent. Delivery styles and their importance is highlighted before the presenter even starts making a presentation and the delivery style needs to be decided in advance. Adaptation to the audience is one of the major aspects that need to be kept in view while delivering an informative presentation. The general idea is to keep the audience attentive towards the presentation. In any case adapting to the audience helps a lot in many ways. The idea that the audience is not interested in what you are saying is quiet correct hence to develop their interest, the presentation should include subject that might be of interest for the audience. This can be achieved with different methods and the starting point is to adapt to the audience. The three categories of adaptation include; The knowledge level of the audience has to be acknowledged by the presenter and than alter the course of his or her presentation. Usually the presenter knows how well informed is the audience about the subject he or she would be talking about hence terms and sentences or the subject matter should be set accordingly. The presenter can only analyze how interested the audience is in what he or she is discussing while the person is presenting, hence the most important aspect while presenting is the interest of the audience. The presenter than needs to include material or activities that might improve the interest level of the audience. The level of acceptance is generally known before the presenter starts his or her presentation according to the topic. The acceptance level basically is the attitude of the audience towards the topic that is being discussed. This needs to kept in mind even before the presentation is being prepared and

Kant's Moral Philosophy Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Kant's Moral Philosophy - Term Paper Example Argument or view Kant’s Deontology posits that the best way to act morally to act from duty with the consideration of the highest good, that is, a good without condition which is intrinsically good by itself (Kant, 1780). He formulated his deontological ethics in a categorical imperative of doing good for the sake of good regardless of its consequence (Kant, 1785). Explication of argument To effectively argue that Kantian Deontology is the correct moral theory, it would be necessary to explain the formulation that executes Kant’s deontology which is categorical imperative. According to Kant, imperatives imply what they meant which are command such as â€Å"wake up early†. Often they are hypothetical imperative because they only serve a specific objective or purpose such as â€Å"wake up early so you will not be later for work. This imperative or command becomes categorical when it is applied universally and that the actions and decisions of individuals are to be judged solely by their motivations and that the consequences do not matter morally (as in the case of hypothetical imperative) neither the intended consequences nor the actual consequences matter morally; only the principle or rule we follow if we do the action matters morally. In simpler terms, this meant doing what is good regardless of consequence and that by doing is an end by itself. Thus, actions themselves become an end and this action should be a rational result in the exercise of freewill Consistent to this, Kant’s categorical imperative states that every person has the duty to use and exercise his goodness/humanity as a means to an end. The application of Kant’s categorical imperative is best illustrated in slave ownership. A slave owner may assert his right to own a property which in this case is a slave. While ownership by itself is not immoral, slave ownership becomes unethical or immoral according to Kant’s categorical imperative because it depriv es a person of his free rational action and that persons can never be a mere means to an end (Johnson, 2012). One distinct characteristic of Kant’s categorical imperative is that it is universal and inflexible that it applies to everyone without exception. For Kant, neither good nor bad luck affects in assessing the moral act of a person. His idea of â€Å"goodwill† did not become good because it serves an end or objective but because it intends to do â€Å"good† regardless of the consequence. Objection The best objection to Kant’s deontological ethics as formulated by categorical imperative is Thomas Nagel’s argument about moral luck. Unlike Kant, Thomas Nagel makes an exception through his assertion of moral luck that there are a broad range of externalities that affects moral judgment. Moral luck occurs when â€Å"an agent can be correctly treated as an object of moral judgment despite the fact that a significant aspect of what she is assessed for depends on factors beyond her control† (Nelkin, 2013). It meant that we should only be assessed morally only to the extent that the factors attendant to the circumstances of our actions that we can control as stated in his â€Å"control principle†. This argument also hold sway because it consider the realities and externalities of which an action must be carried out and therefore, an act is best judged by considering its environment.